Password Spraying: What It Is, How It Works, and How to Defend Against It

Password spraying is one of the most effective credential-based attacks used today, not because it is sophisticated, but because it exploits a simple reality: passwords are still predictable, reused, and widely trusted as a primary authentication factor. Instead of guessing many passwords for a single account, attackers test a single common password across hundreds or thousands of accounts, quietly slipping past lockout policies and traditional security controls.

What makes password spraying especially dangerous is how easily it blends into normal login activity. These attacks are low frequency, distributed, and often go unnoticed until an account is already compromised. For organizations with large workforces, shared devices, or cloud-based authentication systems, a single successful spray can become the entry point for lateral movement, data theft, or ransomware.

In this guide, we break down what password spraying is, how these attacks work, why they are difficult to detect, and who is most at risk. We also explore practical prevention strategies and explain why moving beyond password-based authentication is critical to stopping password spraying at its root.

What Is Password Spraying?

Password spraying is a type of credential-based attack where an attacker attempts to log in to many user accounts using a single common password, rather than trying multiple passwords on one account. The goal is to exploit weak, reused, or predictable passwords while avoiding account lockout mechanisms designed to stop brute-force attacks.

Unlike traditional brute-force attacks that trigger alerts after repeated failed attempts on a single account, password spraying distributes login attempts across many users. Each account may see only one or two failed logins, which makes the activity appear normal and significantly harder to detect.

Attackers typically choose passwords that are widely used within organizations, such as default passwords, seasonal variations, or simple patterns that meet basic complexity rules. Examples include passwords based on company names, months, years, or commonly reused formats.

Because many organizations enforce lockouts after a small number of failed attempts, using one password across many accounts allows attackers to test credentials without raising immediate red flags.

How Password Spraying Works: The Attack Breakdown

Password spraying uses a systematic, low-and-slow approach designed to maximize success while avoiding detection. By understanding how these attacks operate, organizations can build stronger and more targeted defenses.

1. Attackers Compile a Large List of Usernames

Adversaries gather employee names, email addresses, and account identifiers from public sources, social media, and data breaches. Corporate directories, LinkedIn profiles, and conference attendee lists provide username information. Email address formats like firstname.lastname@company.com enable systematic username generation for entire organizations.

2. They Select a Small Set of Common or Weak Passwords

Attackers choose passwords that frequently appear in breach databases and password analysis research. Common selections include "Password1," seasonal variations like "Spring2024," and company-specific terms. They prioritize passwords that meet typical complexity requirements while remaining predictable for users who prioritize convenience over security.

3. Passwords Are Tried Across Many Accounts (Not One at a Time)

The selected password gets attempted against all usernames in the compiled list before moving to the next password. This distribution ensures no single account receives multiple rapid authentication attempts. Attacks spread across thousands of accounts, making detection significantly more difficult than concentrated brute force.

4. They Stay Under Lockout Thresholds

Attackers carefully time authentication attempts, ensuring each account experiences fewer attempts than lockout policies allow. Organizations typically configure five to ten failed attempts before account lockout. Password spraying stays well below these thresholds, appearing as normal user behavior rather than malicious activity.

5. Attackers Repeat the Cycle With Another Weak Password

After attempting a single password across all accounts, attackers wait before trying the next-most-common password. Time delays between cycles prevent rate limiting from blocking attacks. Automated tools manage timing and rotation, keeping attacks below detection thresholds while maintaining persistent pressure.

6. Successful Logins Provide Access to Sensitive Systems

Valid credentials grant attackers legitimate access to corporate networks, cloud platforms, and sensitive applications. Compromised accounts enable lateral movement, data exfiltration, and privilege escalation. Initial access gained through password spraying becomes a foothold for broader organizational compromise and potential ransomware deployment.

By spreading a single password attempt across many accounts and extending attacks over time, password spraying allows attackers to bypass lockout controls and compromise accounts with minimal visibility. This low-effort, low-noise approach raises an important question: why does password spraying continue to work so well against modern authentication systems and security defenses?

[[cta]]

Why Password Spraying is So Effective for Attackers

Password spraying succeeds because it exploits multiple organizational and human vulnerabilities simultaneously. These factors explain why attacks continue despite security awareness.

1. Users Commonly Reuse Weak or Predictable Passwords

Human psychology favors memorable passwords over strong, unique credentials. Users select passwords meeting minimum requirements while remaining easy to remember.

Common Weak Password Patterns

• Seasonal variations such as "Spring2024" or "Summer2025" superficially meet complexity requirements.
• Company name combined with simple numbers such as "CompanyName123" or "CompanyName2024."
• Keyboard patterns like "Qwerty123" or "Password1!" are appearing across organizations universally.
• Personal information, including birthdays, family names, or favorite sports teams, can be easily guessed.
• Simple word substitutions like "P@ssw0rd" or "Adm1n" that remain predictable despite character replacement.

2. It Avoids Account Lockouts and Detection

Distributed attack patterns prevent automated security responses from being triggered. Each account experiences attempts appearing as legitimate user errors.

How Attackers Evade Detection

• Spreading attempts across thousands of accounts, ensuring no single user triggers lockout thresholds.
• Timing delays between authentication cycles prevent rate limiting from blocking coordinated attacks.
• Using legitimate credential combinations from one account to make attempts appear as typical mistakes.
• Rotating IP addresses and using proxies hides attack coordination from traditional security monitoring.
• Staying below alert thresholds configured for individual accounts rather than aggregate patterns.

3. Works at Scale Across Thousands of Accounts

Automation enables attackers to efficiently test millions of credential combinations. Cloud computing resources allow massive parallel authentication attempts.

Scale Advantages for Attackers

• Automated tools handle credential rotation, timing management, and result tracking without manual intervention.
• Cloud infrastructure rental costs pennies, enabling sophisticated attacks with minimal financial investment.
• Low individual success rates become meaningful when attacking thousands of accounts simultaneously.
• Large organizations with diverse user populations create expanded attack surfaces, increasing the likelihood of compromise.
• Distributed infrastructure across multiple providers prevents a single point of blocking by security teams.

4. Exploits Lack of MFA or Poor Authentication Policies

Many organizations implement multi-factor authentication inconsistently, leaving gaps that attackers exploit. Legacy systems and privileged accounts often lack additional verification requirements.

Common Authentication Weaknesses

• Inconsistent MFA deployment leaves critical systems protected only by passwords without additional verification.
• Legacy applications and VPN portals lack modern authentication integration capabilities entirely.
• Service accounts and administrative credentials are exempted from MFA requirements for operational convenience.
• Password policies that emphasize complexity over uniqueness are failing to prevent common password choices.
• Weak enforcement allows users to bypass security controls through exception processes or workarounds.

5. Automated Tools Make Attacks Fast and Low-Cost

Ready-made password spraying tools require minimal technical expertise. Attackers rent cloud infrastructure for pennies and launch sophisticated attacks.

Attack Automation Advantages

• Publicly available tools like Hydra, Medusa, and custom scripts require minimal configuration expertise.
• Tutorial guides and hacking forums provide step-by-step instructions for launching password spraying campaigns.
• Cloud computing services offering anonymous rental enabling attacks without infrastructure investment or attribution.
• Automated credential harvesting from breaches and social media significantly reduces the effort required for reconnaissance.
• Script customization allows attackers to adapt tools to target specific authentication systems and platforms.

6. Many Organizations Use Predictable Default Passwords

Service accounts, administrative credentials, and temporary passwords often follow predictable patterns. Organizations fail to change default credentials on deployed systems.

Default Credential Vulnerabilities

• Standardized initial passwords like "Welcome123" or "ChangeMe2024" are used across new employee onboarding.
• Service account passwords following naming conventions like "ServiceName2024" are easily guessed by attackers.
• Vendor default credentials remain unchanged on deployed systems and network equipment after installation.
• Temporary passwords are communicated through insecure channels and are never changed by users after initial login.
• Administrative accounts use company-wide patterns enabling systematic password guessing across infrastructure components.

Because password spraying avoids lockouts, blends into normal login activity, and exploits predictable password behavior at scale, it remains one of the most reliable ways for attackers to gain initial access. This makes it important to examine which systems, users, and environments are most commonly targeted, along with real-world examples of how password spraying attacks unfold in practice.

Common Targets and Real-World Examples of Password Spraying

Password spraying often targets systems that store critical data or grant privileged access. Identifying these high-risk targets allows organizations to prioritize and reinforce their security measures.

1. Corporate Email Accounts (Office 365, Google Workspace)

Email accounts provide attackers with valuable intelligence, credential reset capabilities, and opportunities for lateral movement. Office 365 and Google Workspace are constantly under attack from password spraying. Compromised email enables business email compromise, phishing campaigns, and access to connected services. Email represents the highest-value initial access target.

2. VPNs, Remote Access Portals, and Legacy Systems

Remote access systems enable network entry from anywhere, making them attractive targets. VPN credentials provide direct access, bypassing perimeter security. Legacy systems often lack modern authentication protections. Password spraying is frequently successful against remote access, focusing attacks on internet-facing authentication systems.

3. Cloud Applications (AWS, Azure, Salesforce, Okta)

Cloud platform credentials grant access to infrastructure, data, and administrative capabilities. AWS, Azure, and other providers are facing persistent password-spraying attacks. Compromised cloud accounts enable data theft, resource abuse, and cryptomining. Cloud platforms represent critical infrastructure requiring the strongest authentication.

4. Single Sign-On (SSO) Platforms Without MFA

SSO credentials unlock access to dozens of connected applications simultaneously. Compromising SSO enables attackers to obtain efficient access across entire application portfolios. Organizations implementing SSO without multi-factor authentication create single points of failure. SSO platforms require the strongest possible authentication given the extensive access they provide.

5. Shared, Dormant, or Default Accounts

Generic accounts, temporary credentials, and abandoned user accounts receive less monitoring attention. Shared accounts cannot attribute activities to individuals, reducing accountability. Dormant accounts may retain elevated privileges even when unused. These account types offer attackers targets with lower detection risk.

These real-world examples show that password spraying rarely targets a single system or user, but instead focuses on high-value access points across large user populations. Understanding these common targets highlights the need to recognize the early warning signs and detection patterns that can help identify password spraying attacks before accounts are compromised.

[[cta-2]]

Key Indicators and How to Detect Password Spraying Attacks

Detecting password spraying requires analyzing authentication patterns across multiple accounts. These indicators help security teams identify ongoing attacks.

1. Unusual Spikes in Failed Login Attempts

Authentication systems experience sudden increases in failed attempts across many accounts. Individual accounts show one or two failures appearing normal. Aggregate analysis reveals coordinated patterns indicating password spraying. Organizations should monitor authentication failure rates system-wide rather than per account.

2. Login Attempts from Unknown or Suspicious IP Addresses

Authentication attempts originate from geographic locations or IP ranges inconsistent with legitimate users. Attackers may use VPNs, proxies, or compromised infrastructure to obscure origins. Known malicious IP addresses from threat intelligence appear in authentication logs. Geographic impossibilities, such as simultaneous attempts from distant locations, indicate attacks.

3. Repeated Login Attempts Using the Same Password Pattern

Multiple accounts experience failures with identical passwords within a short time frame. Password analysis reveals common, predictable passwords being tested systematically. Pattern recognition identifies attackers rotating through standard password lists. This signature distinguishes password spraying from normal user authentication errors.

4. Attempts Targeting Multiple Accounts in a Short Time Window

Authentication logs show that many accounts are experiencing failures from similar sources. Time correlation reveals coordinated attempts rather than independent user errors. Volume spikes affecting numerous accounts simultaneously indicate automated attacks. Sequential patterns through username lists reveal systematic targeting.

5. Authentication Attempts Occurring at Odd Hours

Login attempts happen during non-business hours when legitimate users are unlikely to authenticate. Off-hours attacks reduce detection risks and security team responsiveness. Temporal analysis identifies suspicious authentication patterns inconsistent with normal workforce behavior. Organizations should baseline typical authentication timing to detect anomalies.

While these indicators can help uncover password spraying attempts, they often appear subtle and only after multiple accounts have already been tested. This challenge makes it essential to shift focus from detection alone to proactive best practices that can prevent password spraying attacks before they succeed.

Best Practices to Prevent Password Spraying

Comprehensive defense requires layered security controls addressing multiple attack vectors. These practices significantly reduce the success rate of password spraying.

1. Enforce Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Everywhere

Deploy MFA across all authentication scenarios to eliminate password-only access. Require additional verification even when passwords are correct. MFA defeats password spraying because attackers cannot complete the second authentication factor. Prioritize phishing-resistant MFA methods, such as biometrics or security keys.

2. Implement Strong Password Policies and Ban Common Passwords

Configure systems to reject passwords appearing in breach databases or shared password lists. Block predictable patterns like seasonal terms, company names, and simple variations. Enforce true password uniqueness, not just complexity. Organizations should regularly update their banned password lists.

3. Use Adaptive or Risk-Based Authentication

Deploy authentication systems, evaluate contextual signals, and identify suspicious attempts. Risk-based authentication requires additional verification when attempts appear anomalous. Geographic location, device characteristics, and timing inform risk assessments. Adaptive security responds dynamically to attack patterns.

4. Limit Login Attempts and Monitor Authentication Logs

Implement rate limiting to restrict authentication attempts from a single source. Configure alerts for unusual authentication patterns across multiple accounts. Deploy SIEM systems correlating authentication events and identifying distributed attacks. Proactive monitoring enables rapid response before significant compromise.

5. Move Toward Passwordless Authentication

Eliminate passwords to remove the vulnerability of password spraying. Deploy biometric authentication, hardware keys, or passkeys, replacing password-based verification. Passwordless authentication approaches offer superior security while improving the user experience. Organizations transitioning to passwordless eliminate entire attack classes.

[[cta-3]]

Eliminate Password Spraying Risks with OLOID’s Contactless Authentication Platform

Password spraying is not just another credential attack. It is a direct consequence of continued reliance on passwords in environments where scale, shared access, and human behavior make password security impossible to sustain. As attackers increasingly target identity rather than infrastructure, password spraying remains a reliable entry point because passwords are predictable, reusable, and easy to test quietly across large user populations.

This risk is especially critical for organizations with frontline workers who rely on shared devices, fast logins, and high-frequency access throughout the day. OLOID’s passwordless authentication solution helps organizations eliminate this attack vector entirely by removing passwords from frontline authentication.

Through contactless, passwordless authentication using biometrics and secure identity binding, OLOID ensures that access is tied to the individual, not a shared secret that can be guessed or sprayed. With no passwords to steal or reuse, password spraying attacks are stopped at the root.

OLOID’s platform is built for real-world frontline environments, enabling fast, hygienic, and secure authentication on shared devices while maintaining strong identity assurance. By combining passwordless access with continuous verification and enterprise-grade security controls, OLOID helps organizations reduce credential risk without slowing down operations.

If you are looking to protect your frontline workforce from password-based attacks while improving access speed and security, now is the time to move beyond passwords. Request a demo to see how OLOID enables secure, contactless, passwordless authentication for frontline teams.

FAQs on Password Spraying

1. Why is password spraying so common?

Password spraying succeeds because it exploits predictable human behavior by targeting weak, memorable passwords. The technique avoids detection mechanisms designed to detect concentrated brute-force attacks.

Automated tools make attacks accessible to unsophisticated adversaries with minimal resources. Organizations implementing strong individual account protections remain vulnerable to distributed attacks. Success rates justify attackers' continued investment in password spraying campaigns.

2. Which accounts are most vulnerable to password spraying?

Accounts using common, predictable passwords are the most vulnerable, regardless of other security measures. Shared accounts, service accounts, and temporary credentials often use weak standardized passwords.

Accounts lacking multi-factor authentication provide attackers unobstructed access after password compromise. Privileged and administrative accounts represent high-value targets that attackers prioritize. Legacy systems and remote access portals frequently lack modern authentication protections.

3. How can organizations detect password spraying attacks?

Detection requires analyzing authentication patterns across multiple accounts rather than monitoring individuals. Security teams should alert on unusual spikes in failed authentication attempts across the system. Geographic analysis identifies authentication attempts from unexpected locations or suspicious IP addresses.

Correlation of failed attempts using identical passwords across accounts reveals spraying patterns. SIEM systems and authentication analytics platforms provide visibility into distributed attack indicators.

4. Can password spraying attacks be entirely eliminated?

Organizations can eliminate password spraying vulnerabilities by removing passwords entirely through passwordless authentication. Multi-factor authentication prevents attackers from succeeding even when passwords are compromised.

Risk-based authentication detects and blocks suspicious patterns before compromise occurs. However, complete elimination requires comprehensive implementation without enforcement gaps. Organizations should view defense as layered security rather than a single solution.